Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1KT5a6Z+mjphT5ZaMn78eD6RcHRWWcsAkNPiWgUooeqfw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput? ("Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 5:45 PM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, at 4:06 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > > I have made few minor changes in the attached. (a) Initialize the > streaming message callback API, (b) update docs to reflect that XID > can be sent for streaming of in-progress transactions, I see that the > same information needs to be updated for a few other protocol message > but we can do that as a separate patch (c) slightly tweaked the commit > messages > > Good catch. I completely forgot the streaming of in progress transactions. I > agree that the documentation for transaction should be added as a separate > patch since the scope is beyond this feature. > I have pushed this work and updated the CF entry accordingly. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: