Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix cardinality estimates for parallel joins.
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix cardinality estimates for parallel joins. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1KPm8RYa1Kun3ZmQj9pb723b-EFN70j47Pid1vn3ByquA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix cardinality estimates for parallel joins. (Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-committers |
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Fix cardinality estimates for parallel joins.
>
+ /*
+ * In the case of a parallel plan, the row count needs to represent
+ * the number of tuples processed per worker.
+ */
+ path->rows = clamp_row_est(path->rows / parallel_divisor);
}
path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
@@ -2014,6 +1996,10 @@ final_cost_nestloop(PlannerInfo *root, NestPath *path,
else
path->path.rows = path->path.parent->rows;
+ /* For partial paths, scale row estimate. */
+ if (path->path.parallel_workers > 0)
+ path->path.rows /= get_parallel_divisor(&path->path);
Isn't it better to call clamp_row_est in join costing functions as we
are doing in cost_seqscan()? Is there a reason to keep those
different?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: