Re: [HACKERS] SerializedSnapshotData alignment
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] SerializedSnapshotData alignment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1KKdR2JJhWTZkRYnzGuQbjv-eXcFo=eA+ajT8AezX=EpA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] SerializedSnapshotData alignment (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > Dear 7b4ac19 authors, > > Field ps_snapshot_data usually receives four-byte alignment within > ParallelIndexScanDescData, but it contains the eight-byte whenTaken field. > The select_parallel test dies with SIGBUS on "Oracle Solaris 10 1/13 > s10s_u11wos_24a SPARC", building with gcc 4.9.2. Some credible fixes: > > 1. Move the SerializedSnapshotData declaration from snapmgr.c to snapmgr.h and > declare the ps_snapshot_data field to be of type SerializedSnapshotData. > Probably also add a field "TransactionId xids[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]" to > SerializedSnapshotData, to assert the variable-length nature. > > 2. Change "char ps_snapshot_data[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]" to "int64 ...". I > have attached this in SerializedSnapshot-int64-v1.patch. > > 3. Change no declarations, and make snapmgr.c memcpy() the > SerializedSnapshotData through a local buffer. I have attached this as > SerializedSnapshot-memcpy-v1.patch. > > I like (2) well enough, but I don't see that technique used elsewhere in the > tree. > You seem to have forgotten to change all the callers of Serialize/RestoreSnapshot to int64* which is causing below warnings on my m/c: 1>src/backend/access/transam/parallel.c(334): warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'int64 *' 1>src/backend/access/transam/parallel.c(338): warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'int64 *' 1>src/backend/access/transam/parallel.c(1072): warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'int64 *' 1>src/backend/access/transam/parallel.c(1078): warning C4133: 'function' : incompatible types - from 'char *' to 'int64 *' > (1) is more typical of PostgreSQL, though I personally like it when > structs can stay private to a file. (3) is also well-attested, particularly > in xlog replay code. I am leaning toward (2). Other opinions? > Your Approach-2 patch looks like a sane idea to me, if we decide to do it some other way, I can write a patch unless you prefer to do it by yourself. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: