Re: parallel vacuum - few questions on docs, comments and code
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: parallel vacuum - few questions on docs, comments and code |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1KJ9sSZ2MFvvKFYnjQeHGQkC2uCBs4Ttv5Rmj2WSpzNQQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: parallel vacuum - few questions on docs, comments and code (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 1:30 PM Bharath Rupireddy > <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:10 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > If the patch changes the vacuumdb code as above then isn't it better > > > to change the vacuumdb docs to reflect the same. See below part of > > > vacuumdb docs: > > > -P parallel_degree > > > --parallel=parallel_degree > > > > Changed. > > > > > Also, can you please check if your patch works for PG-13 as well > > > because I think it is better to backpatch it? > > > > I'm not sure about backpatching as it is not a critical bug fix. Since > > the changes are user visible, I think that it's okay to backpatch. > > > > Yes, as it is a user-visible change (though minor) so I thought it > would be good to backpatch this. Does anyone else have any opinion on > this? > Pushed! -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: