Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication

On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 11:33 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:24:50AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I think the next possible step here is to document how to upgrade the
> > logical replication nodes as previously discussed in this thread [1].
> > IIRC, there were a few issues with the steps mentioned but if we want
> > to document those we can start a separate thread for it as that
> > involves both publishers and subscribers.
> >
> > [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm2pe7SoOGtRkrTNsnZPnaaY%2B2iHC40HBYCSLYmyRg0wSw%40mail.gmail.com
>
> Yep.  A second thing is whether it makes sense to have more automated
> test coverage when it comes to the interferences between subscribers
> and publishers with more complex node structures.
>

I think it would be good to finish the pending patch to improve the
IsBinaryUpgrade check [1] which we decided to do once this patch is
ready. Would you like to take that up or do you want me to finish it?

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZU2TeVkUg5qEi7Oy%40paquier.xyz
[2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZVQtUTdJACnsbbpd%40paquier.xyz

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.