Re: tablesync copy ignores publication actions
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tablesync copy ignores publication actions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1K=s-jwGxrU2WjEiN1wuWR7WXO8c9CJnmhCe8BcGA-paA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: tablesync copy ignores publication actions ("shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: tablesync copy ignores publication actions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 8:43 AM shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 4:49 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > This patch looks mostly good to me except for a few minor comments > > > which are mentioned below. It is not very clear in which branch(es) we > > > should commit this patch? As per my understanding, this is a > > > pre-existing behavior but we want to document it because (a) It was > > > not already documented, and (b) we followed it for row filters in > > > PG-15 it seems that should be explained. So, we have the following > > > options (a) commit it only for PG-15, (b) commit for PG-15 and > > > backpatch the relevant sections, or (c) commit it when branch opens > > > for PG-16. What do you or others think? > > > > Even though this is a very old docs omission, AFAIK nobody ever raised > > it as a problem before. It only became more important because of the > > PG15 row-filters. So I think option (a) is ok. > > > > I also think option (a) is ok. > > > > > PSA patch v4 to address all the above review comments. > > > > Thanks for updating the patch. It looks good to me. > The patch looks good to me as well. I will push this patch in HEAD (as per option (a)) tomorrow unless I see any more suggestions/comments. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: