Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1K8YfD-girg5upryTDm4dJ6U7pjPR2hX8cbM_g807MDXw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 9:20 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > I have reviewed the latest version and made a few changes along with fixing some of the pending comments by Peter Smith. The changes are as follows: (a) Removed m_databaseid in PgStat_MsgSubscriptionError as that is not required now; (b) changed the struct name PgStat_MsgSubscriptionPurge to PgStat_MsgSubscriptionDrop to make it similar to DropDb; (c) changed the view name to pg_stat_subscription_stats, we can reconsider it in future if there is a consensus on some other name, accordingly changed the reset function name to pg_stat_reset_subscription_stats; (d) moved some of the newly added subscription stats functions adjacent to slots to main the consistency in code; (e) changed comments at few places; (f) added LATERAL back to system_views query as we refer pg_subscription's oid in the function call, previously that was not clear. Do let me know what you think of the attached? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: