Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 927, PID: 568639)
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 927, PID: 568639) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1K6XH3ZfWn1v53OL1pRrRHik3zBbKCcJcED2Y8kBu5rEw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 927, PID: 568639) (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 927, PID: 568639)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 4:47 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 1:08 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:58 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I've attached two patches that need to be back-patched to all branches > > > and includes Change-1, Change-2, and a test case for them. FYI this > > > patch resolves the assertion failure reported in this thread as well > > > as one reported in another thread[2]. So I borrowed some of the > > > changes from the patch[2] Osumi-san recently proposed. > > > > > > > Amit pointed out offlist that the changes in reorderbuffer.c is not > > pgindent'ed. I've run pgindent and attached updated patches. > > > > Thanks, I have tested these across all branches till v10 and it works > as expected. I am planning to push this tomorrow unless I see any > further comments. > Pushed. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: