Re: doc: improve the restriction description of using indexes on REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table.
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: doc: improve the restriction description of using indexes on REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1K3M=YFNed2ahCKdzxwTAoj-93jg0fcyabcu-wY0w1eTA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: doc: improve the restriction description of using indexes on REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table. (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: doc: improve the restriction description of using indexes on REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 4:54 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 2:21 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 7:55 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 1:49 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 1:36 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I prefer the first suggestion. I've attached the updated patch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > This looks mostly good to me but I think it would be better if we can > > > > also add the information that the leftmost index column must be a > > > > non-expression. So, how about: "Candidate indexes must be btree, > > > > non-partial, and the leftmost index column must be a non-expression > > > > and reference to a published table column (i.e. cannot consist of only > > > > expressions)."? > > > > > > That part in parentheses ought to say "the index ..." because it is > > > referring to the full INDEX, not to the leftmost column. I think this > > > was missed when Sawada-san took my previous suggestion [1]. > > > > > > IMO it doesn't sound right to say the "index column must be a > > > non-expression". It is already a non-expression because it is a > > > column. So I think it would be better to refer to this as an INDEX > > > "field" instead of an INDEX column. Note that "field" is the same > > > terminology used in the docs for CREATE INDEX [2]. > > > > > > > I thought it would be better to be explicit for this case but I am > > fine if Sawada-San and you prefer some other way to document it. > > > > I see. How about just moving the parenthesized part to explicitly > refer only to the leftmost field? > > SUGGESTION > Candidate indexes must be btree, non-partial, and the leftmost index > field must be a column (not an expression) that references a published > table column. > Yeah, something like that works for me. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: