Re: row filtering for logical replication

On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:18 AM shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com
<shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 10:40 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 5:42 PM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022, at 8:45 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > >
> > > While working on the column filtering patch, which touches about the
> > > same places, I noticed two minor gaps in testing:
> > >
> > > 1) The regression tests do perform multiple ALTER PUBLICATION commands,
> > > tweaking the row filter. But there are no checks the row filter was
> > > actually modified / stored in the catalog. It might be just thrown away
> > > and no one would notice.
> > >
> > > The test that row filter was modified is available in a previous section. The
> > > one that you modified (0001) is testing the supported objects.
> > >
> >
> > Right. But if Tomas thinks it is good to add for these ones as well
> > then I don't mind.
> >
> > > 153 ALTER PUBLICATION testpub5 ADD TABLE testpub_rf_tbl3 WHERE (e > 1000
> > AND e < 2000);
> > > 154 \dRp+ testpub5
> > > 155 ALTER PUBLICATION testpub5 DROP TABLE testpub_rf_tbl2;
> > > 156 \dRp+ testpub5
> > > 157 -- remove testpub_rf_tbl1 and add testpub_rf_tbl3 again (another WHERE
> > expression)
> > > 158 ALTER PUBLICATION testpub5 SET TABLE testpub_rf_tbl3 WHERE (e > 300
> > AND e < 500);
> > > 159 \dRp+ testpub5
> > >
> > > IIRC this test was written before adding the row filter information into the
> > > psql. We could add \d+ testpub_rf_tbl3 before and after the modification.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Agreed. We can use \d instead of \d+ as row filter is available with \d.
> >
> > > 2) There are no pg_dump tests.
> > >
> > > WFM.
> > >
> >
> > This is a miss. I feel we can add a few more.
> >
>
> Agree that we can add some tests, attach the patch which fixes these two points.
>

LGTM. I'll push this tomorrow unless Tomas or Euler feels otherwise.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.