On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:54 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> PSA my patch to correct this by firstly doing a HASH_FIND, then only
> HASH_REMOVE after we've finished using the ent.
>
Why can't we keep using HASH_REMOVE as it is but get the output (entry
found or not) in the last parameter of hash_search API and then
perform Assert based on that? See similar usage in reorderbuffer.c and
rewriteheap.c.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.