Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:14:28AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:>
>> >>> support related patch.  In anycase, to avoid confusion I am attaching
>> >>> all the three patches with this e-mail.
>> >>
>> >> Committed guc_parallel_index_scan_v1.patch, with changes to the
>> >> documentation and GUC descriptions.
>> >
>> > And committed parallel_index_opt_exec_support_v10.patch as well, with
>> > a couple of minor tweaks.
>>
>> Thanks a lot!  I think this is a big step forward for parallelism in
>> PostgreSQL.  Now, we have another way to drive parallel scans and I
>> hope many more queries can use parallelism.
>
> Shouldn't the chapter 15.3 "Parallel Plans" in the documentation be
> updated for this as well, or is this going to be taken care as a batch
> at the ned of the development cycle, pending other added parallization
> features?
>

Robert mentioned up thread that it is better to update it once at end
rather than with each feature.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com