Re: Invalidate the subscription worker in cases where a user loses their superuser status
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Invalidate the subscription worker in cases where a user loses their superuser status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1JztFkYeVANuH0Ja_c3zqDjTyz0j15xQqwCDRPokYhWgw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Invalidate the subscription worker in cases where a user loses their superuser status (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Invalidate the subscription worker in cases where a user loses their superuser status
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 8:22 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > --- a/src/include/catalog/pg_subscription.h +++ b/src/include/catalog/pg_subscription.h @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ typedef struct Subscription * skipped */ char *name; /* Name of the subscription */ Oid owner; /* Oid of the subscription owner */ + bool ownersuperuser; /* Is the subscription owner a superuser? */ bool enabled; /* Indicates if the subscription is enabled */ bool binary; /* Indicates if the subscription wants data in * binary format */ We normally don't change the exposed structure in back branches as that poses a risk of breaking extensions. In this case, if we want, we can try to squeeze some padding space or we even can fix it without introducing a new member. OTOH, it is already debatable whether to fix it in back branches, so we can even commit this patch just in HEAD. Thoughts? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: