Re: Logical Replication - detail message with names of missing columns
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logical Replication - detail message with names of missing columns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1JvQFZw5dJdXqpBJNapznye=4qD=q=EMXQXA5Vbt4hdTg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Logical Replication - detail message with names of missing columns (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:00 PM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Amit for the review comments. I will post an updated patch soon. > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:39 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 6. I think we should add one test case for this in the existing > > regression test (src/test/subscription/t/008_diff_schema). > > > > This patch logs the missing column names message in subscriber server > logs. Is there a way to see the logs in these tests and use that as > expected result for the test case? > I don't think there is any direct way to achieve that. What we can do is to check that the data is not replicated in such a case but I don't think it is worth to add a test for that behavior. So, I think we can skip adding a test for this unless someone else has a better idea to do the same. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: