Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1Jpj2Ebk2C_9meEDfZKen38cxpzOkxZ7818f1cfsT8=3w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:26 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > ``` > > It succeeds if force_alter is also expressly set. Prepared transactions will be > aborted at that time. > > ``` > subscriber=# ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub SET (two_phase = off, force_alter = on); > ALTER SUBSCRIPTION > Isn't it better to give a Notice when force_alter option leads to the rollback of already prepared transactions? I have another question on the latest 0001 patch: + /* + * Stop all the subscription workers, just in case. + * Workers may still survive even if the subscription is + * disabled. + */ + logicalrep_workers_stop(subid); In which case the workers will survive when the subscription is disabled? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: