Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1Jm8015o0GahMXg-ewrtvwmUc7_LhJ7oLywrx3y0M1vsQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:58 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > OK. Now using your suggested 2nd sentence: > > +# The subscription's running status and failover option should be preserved > +# in the upgraded instance. So regress_sub1 should still have > subenabled,subfailover > +# set to true, while regress_sub2 should have both set to false. > > ~ > > I also tweaked some other nearby comments/messages which did not > mention the 'failover' preservation. > Looks mostly good to me. One minor nitpick: * along with retaining the replication origin's remote lsn -# and subscription's running status. +# and subscription's running status and failover option. I don't think we need to use 'and' twice in the above sentence. We should use ',' between different properties. I can change this on Monday and push it unless you think otherwise. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: