Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1Jjyp0pw=WDvBF_TjEX=f7tYDOw8QhGWaCv653vGj=36w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge (Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 3:59 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:44:16 +0530 > Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 9:05 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > > <jgdr@dalibo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:29:00 +0530 > > > Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > BTW, can you please test if the problem exist in back-branches, and does > > > > your change fix it there as well? > > > > > > Gather Merge appears in v10, but I haven't been able to produce a plan > > > using it. > > > > I am able to do it for v10. I think you can try by "set > > enable_hashagg = off;" and following all other steps mentioned in your > > email? > > Indeed. I confirm it produces the same result. I've been able to successfully > test to proposed fix. > Cool. > > Attached, please find the patch for v10 with a modified commit > > message. I will do it for other versions as well if you are fine with > > it? > > I'm not an english-native writer, but I would rephrase this: > > We can do a similar thing for Gather Merge as well but it seems the better > to account for stats during nodes shutdown after completing the execution. > Fair enough. I will adopt your suggestion before commit. I'll wait for a day or so to see if anyone has more comments. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: