Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review])
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1Jh1B7-VRSnsudTUW-Zace6PQ-ZO6ZBOhWRV0scNLtmWA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters
(RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via
SQL [review])
Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > * Amit Kapila (amit.kapila16@gmail.com) wrote: >> If both are okay, then I would like to go with second option (include >> file mechanism). >> I think by default, we should allow auto file to be included and if >> user faces any problem or otherwise, >> then he can decide to disable it. > > If it's enabled by default, then we need to ship an 'auto' file which is > empty by default... initdb will create the empty auto file. If we don't enable by default, then if user uses ALTER SYSTEM and do sighup/restart, changed config parameter values will not come into affect until he manually enables it by removing '#' from '#include'. > I don't particularly like that (implies that an > empty file is acceptable and not an error condition, which it otherwise > probably would be...). I'm still not a big fan of enabling it by default > tho. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: