Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1Jesa_G-NOHmV3cCO7Eg=GJt4AWVeFAVyDHoTaq3H-R7Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:04 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 7:52 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I've not looked at the patches yet but as Amit mentioned before[1], > > it's better to move 0002 patch to after 0004. That is, 0001 patch > > changes data type to NameData, 0002 patch adds total_txn and > > total_bytes, and 0003 patch adds regression tests. 0004 patch will be > > the patch using HTAB (was 0002 patch) and get reviewed after pushing > > 0001, 0002, and 0003 patches. 0005 patch adds more regression tests > > for the problem 0004 patch addresses. > > I will make the change for this and post a patch for this. > Currently we have kept total_txns and total_bytes at the beginning of > pg_stat_replication_slots, I did not see any conclusion on this. I > preferred it to be at the beginning. > Thoughts? > I prefer those two fields after spill and stream fields. I have mentioned the same in one of the emails above. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: