Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1JeBycTHw6rG_Db_9xNWEuK1kCpEAG-2UoMGeaU6TTqaw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions) ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 2:21 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > Few comments: 1. + /* + * If we've requested to shut down, exit the process. + * + * Note that WalSndDone() cannot be used here because the delaying + * changes will be sent in the function. + */ + if (got_STOPPING) + { + QueryCompletion qc; + + /* Inform the standby that XLOG streaming is done */ + SetQueryCompletion(&qc, CMDTAG_COPY, 0); + EndCommand(&qc, DestRemote, false); + pq_flush(); Do we really need to do anything except for breaking the loop and let the exit handling happen in the main loop when 'got_STOPPING' is set? AFAICS, this is what we are doing in some other palces (See WalSndWaitForWal). Won't that work? It seems that will help us sending all the pending WAL. 2. + /* Try to flush pending output to the client */ + if (pq_flush_if_writable() != 0) + WalSndShutdown(); Is there a reason to try flushing here? Apart from the above, I have made a few changes in the comments in the attached diff patch. If you agree with those then please include them in the next version. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: