Re: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1JcfTzpjqS+qhXdfjyg4Q1r3VFSAvK=eSW09if=PcuZUQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The main point is if we >> keep any loose end in this area, then there is a chance that the >> regression test select_parallel can still fail, if not now, then in >> future. Another way could be that we can try to minimize the race >> condition here and then adjust the select_parallel as suggested above >> so that we don't see this failure. > > My guess is that if we apply the fix I suggested above, it'll be good > enough. If that turns out not to be true, then I guess we'll have to > deal with that, but why not do the easy thing first? > Okay, that is also a sensible approach. Your patch looks good to me, though I have not tested it. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: