Re: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1JcRZHrqRed+NzwBET9kyGf6mbY_s5xy-nsrxZtVtnaiw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 8:38 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 7:10 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, November 25, 2021 4:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 1:30 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > I agree with backpatching the doc fix. I've attached a diff against > > > > master, though it also appears to apply to 13 and 14 branches. > > > > > > > > > > I think we can <literal></literal> for publish_via_partition_root, other than that > > > the patch looks good to me. > > > > > > Hou-San, others, do you have any opinion about this patch and whether to > > > backpatch it or not? > > > > I think it makes sense to backpatch the doc fix, and the patch looks good to me. > > > > Thanks, I'll push this sometime early next week unless there are any > objections to it. > Pushed. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: