Re: Correction in doc of failover ready steps
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Correction in doc of failover ready steps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1JahE4YRb1ixyKdi7uc-v1cbO3iJVWNbAOkzBSdbDXVwA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Correction in doc of failover ready steps (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Correction in doc of failover ready steps
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:40 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:14 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > I also agree that separating the 2 queries makes sense. > > Please find the patch with the suggested change. > One minor comment: - if the table copy is finished (See <xref linkend="catalog-pg-subscription-rel"/>). + On the subscriber node, use the following SQL to identify which main + slots should be synced to the standby that we plan to promote. This query Shall we refer to these slots as replication slots instead of main slots in the above sentence? We don't have a main slot terminology at other places, so it would be better not to introduce a new one. I know that it was introduced in the original commit but it seems better to change if we agree. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: