Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1JPCd=GowHHkpri=T4KG6DrJnDj-u4nh434YCyR5cu3vw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 7:36 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > Well, I think the comments could be more clear - for the insert case > > specifically - about which cases you think are and are not safe. > Okay, I'll update the patch accordingly. > Yeah, the proposed comment changes don't actually add much. Also > please try to avoid inserting non-ASCII into the source code; > at least in my mail reader, that attachment has some. > I don't see any non-ASCII characters in the patch. I have applied and checked (via vi editor) the patch as well but don't see any non-ASCII characters. How can I verify that? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: