Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1JHeN6o3acgRr8Mu2uhC642C+=jVxPDhecpMy0CACkmyA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 9:58 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 05:45:16PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:11 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Found that some documentation hasn't been updated for the changes made as part of > > > streaming large in-progress transactions. Attached a patch that adds the missing changes. Let me know if anything moreneeds to be added or any comments on this change. > > > > > > > Thanks, this mostly looks good to me. I have slightly modified it. > > See, what do you think of the attached? > > + Protocol version. Currently versions <literal>1</literal> and > + <literal>2</literal> are supported. The version <literal>2</literal> > + is supported only for server versions 14 and above, and is used to allow > + streaming of large in-progress transactions. > > The diff briefly confused me, since this is in protocol.sgml, and since the > libpq protocol version is 1/2/3, with 2 being removed in v14 (3174d69fb). > I suggest to say "replication protocol version 2". > > I realize that the headings make this more clear when reading the .html, so > maybe there's no issue. > Yeah, this was the reason to not include replication. If one is reading the document or even *.sgml, there shouldn't be any confusion but if you or others feel so, we can use 'replication' as well. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: