Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1JFug3fBo5ruVv+inD7eoSzTbcursSq3JB0zYW7BviNtg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Pavan Deolasee > <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote: >> It's quite possible that I don't understand the differences in "role" and >> "session authorization", but it still looks like a bug to me. May be >> SerializeGUCState() should check if SetRoleIsActive is true and only then >> save the role information? > > Ugh. Well, this is definitely a bug, but I'm not sure if that's the right fix. > Yeah. > Mutually interdependent GUCs are bad news. > I am able to reproduce this without involving session authorization guc as well. One needs to drop the newly created role from another session, then also we can see the same error. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: