Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1JFhbBf-LywUU0YJUTcKTFjZvbXi-42DwCd-xojWKhRXA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 4:06 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > 5 === (coming from v62-0002) > > + Assert(tuplestore_tuple_count(res->tuplestore) == 1); > > > > Is it even possible for the related query to not return only one row? (I think the > > "count" ensures it). > > I think you are right. This assertion was added sometime back on the > basis of feedback on hackers. Let me review that again. I can consider > this comment in the next version. > OTOH, can't we keep the assert as it is but remove "= 1" from "count(*) = 1" in the query. There shouldn't be more than one slot with same name on the primary. Or, am I missing something? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: