Re: A small typo
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A small typo |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1J9+3to67DpJTZHzQPYbvcOeK7X_51137XCyWoBsPU0SQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A small typo (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: A small typo
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 9:10 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes: > > There are basically two good reasons to back-patch comment changes: > > * fear that the comment is wrong enough to mislead people looking > at the older branch; > > * fear that leaving it alone will create a merge hazard for future > back-patches. > > It doesn't seem to me that either of those is a strong concern > in this case. In the absence of these concerns, back-patching > seems like make-work (and useless expenditure of buildfarm > cycles). > Agreed. I'll push this to HEAD after some time. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: