Re: Question about building an exportable snapshop
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Question about building an exportable snapshop |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1J8L2zydAKfyYdnMxY7xWMCi79vD56qvqt7238TZ4q1Ag@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Question about building an exportable snapshop (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Question about building an exportable snapshop
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 6:21 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > While working on the issue [1], I realize that if a subtransaction > hasn't done any catalog change then we don't add this in the commit > xid list even if we are building a full snapshot [2]. > I think this is true only if we have reached SNAPBUILD_CONSISTENT state otherwise, we are adding subtransactions in the committed xip array by setting 'needs_timetravel' to true. And if we have already reached a consistent state before it then we anyway don't need to add this. If this is true, do you still see any problem? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: