Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1J70Aj6Pvt31LYMD8ptMv7+9WFN0cQLq1LGhCYPFM9njw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
Client_Count/Patch_Ver 1 64 128 256 HEAD(481725c0) 963 28145 28593 26447 Patch-1 938 28152 31703 29402 We can see 10~11% performance improvement as observedpreviously. You might see 0.02% performance difference withpatch as regression, but that is just a run-to-run variation.Don't the single-client numbers show about a 3% regresssion? Surely not 0.02%.
Sorry, you are right, it is ~2.66%, but in read-write pgbench tests, I
could see such fluctuation. Also patch doesn't change single-client
case. However, if you still feel that there could be impact by patch,
I can re-run the single client case once again with different combinations
like first with HEAD and then patch and vice versa.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: