Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: error context for vacuum to include block number |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1J4wNO425WjKj2Yd58Ag=LovSkxoHTuBJphFma+9jLAJA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: error context for vacuum to include block number (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 9:46 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:25:14PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > > Yea, and it would be misleading if we reported "while scanning block..of > > > relation" if we actually failed while writing its FSM. > > > > > > My previous patches did this: > > > > > > + case VACUUM_ERRCB_PHASE_VACUUM_FSM: > > > + errcontext("while vacuuming free space map of relation \"%s.%s\"", > > > + cbarg->relnamespace, cbarg->relname); > > > + break; > > > > > > > In what kind of errors will this help? > > If there's an I/O error on an _fsm file, for one. > If there is a read or write failure, then we give error like below which already has required information. ereport(ERROR, (errcode_for_file_access(), errmsg("could not read block %u in file \"%s\": %m", blocknum, FilePathName(v->mdfd_vfd)))); -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: