Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1J3_wBtC=9swQYmyKhRJf_j-1pu2et565QpVa89yjQR3A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum (Mahendra Singh <mahi6run@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:02 PM Mahendra Singh <mahi6run@gmail.com> wrote: > > 5. I am not sure that I am right but I can see that we are not consistent while ending the single line comments. > > I think, if single line comment is started with "upper case letter", then we should not put period(dot) at the end of comment,but if comment started with "lower case letter", then we should put period(dot) at the end of comment. > > a) > + /* parallel vacuum must be active */ > I think. we should end above comment with dot or we should make "p" of parallel as upper case letter. > > b) > + /* At least count itself */ > I think, above is correct. > I have checked a few files in this context and I don't see any consistency, so I would suggest keeping the things matching with the nearby code. Do you have any reason for the above conclusion? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: