Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1J0VRNckL5_LB+tA1dZmP69HjPZ7qYXf2PyvAfuUGMDKg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions (Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:27 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Why did you make a change in stream_start API? I think it should be > > *_change and *_truncate APIs because the concurrent abort can happen > > while decoding any intermediate change. If you agree then you can > > probably take that code into a separate function and call it from the > > respective APIs. > > > Patch 0001: > Updated this from stream_start to stream_change. I haven't updated > *_truncate as the test case written for this does not include a > truncate. > I think the same check should be there in truncate as well to make the APIs consistent and also one can use it for writing another test that has a truncate operation. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: