Re: dsm_unpin_segment
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dsm_unpin_segment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1J-9At74-66CxjYO56hMkLShhnmZ4N3DE5UOR-JV-VVsA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: dsm_unpin_segment (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: dsm_unpin_segment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >> + int control_slot = -1; >> ... >> + if (control_slot == -1) >> + elog(ERROR, "cannot unpin unknown segment handle"); >> >> Isn't it better to use INVALID_CONTROL_SLOT for control_slot and use >> datatype as uint32 (same is used for dsm_segment->control_slot and >> nitems)? > > Yes, it is better. New version attached. > This version of patch looks good to me. I have marked it as Ready For Committer. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: