Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+yeLwBCkTvTdPM-hSk1fr6jT8KJc362CN8zrGztq_JqQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:03 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Amit. > > PSA the v19 patch for the Tablesync Solution1. > I see one race condition in this patch where we try to drop the origin via apply process and DropSubscription. I think it can lead to the error "cache lookup failed for replication origin with oid %u". The same problem can happen via exposed API pg_replication_origin_drop but probably because this is not used concurrently so nobody faced this issue. I think for the matter of this patch we can try to suppress such an error either via try..catch, or by adding missing_ok argument to replorigin_drop API, or we can just add to comments that such a race exists. Additionally, we should try to start a new thread for the existence of this problem in pg_replication_origin_drop. What do you think? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: