Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+xd30Knn-iExiejNNvZLq9PJ6uyvqDacDrL=zgiUnWmg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile. (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 6:42 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 2020-Sep-10, Amit Kapila wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:03 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > > > The comments already say what you said in the second suggestion:"The > > caller must rely on timestamp stored in *ts iff the function returns > > true.". Read iff "as if and only if" > > I think "must" should be "may" there, if we're nitpicking. > Here, we want to say that "caller can rely on *ts only if the function returns true". If we replace 'must' with 'may' then it seems to me we are trying to say that caller can ignore the timestamp value, if so, why at first place caller has called this function. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: