Re: Added schema level support for publication.

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:54 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> From Friday, September 10, 2021 10:33 AM Hou Zhijie<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Besides, If we don't want to use a new flag to distinguish tablename and schemaname,
> We can only check the NodeTag to distinguish the difference.
>
> Attach two diff patches based on the latest schema patch
> which change the code with a flag and without a flag.
>

I would prefer a version without additional flags unless you think it
is difficult to extend it in the future for other objects like
sequences which as far as I can see shouldn't be the case. Is there a
reason to define pubobj_name similar to any_name? If so, then please
do add the comments. One reason I could think of is that any_name is
not used for schema names currently which might have motivated you to
define a separate naming convention for publication.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.