Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+tLEo0WSgeU7rrd6C3cz=K3LgHjdY_RMwzVVoxDdaPgg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:44 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 at 17:28, Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Please find the attached v64 patches. The changes in this version > > w.r.t. older patch v63 are as - > > - The changes from the v63-0001 patch have been moved to a separate thread [1]. > > - The v63-0002 patch has been split into two parts in v64: > > 1) 001 patch: Implements the main feature - inactive timeout-based > > slot invalidation. > > 2) 002 patch: Separates the TAP test "044_invalidate_inactive_slots" > > as suggested above. > > Currently the test takes around 220 seconds for me. We could do the > following changes to bring it down to around 70 to 80 seconds: > Even then it is too long for a single test to be part of committed code. So, we can temporarily reduce its time but fixing comments on this is not a good use of time. We need to write this test in some other way if we want to see it committed. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: