Re: zheap: a new storage format for PostgreSQL
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: zheap: a new storage format for PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+pk8Brpnb=WHr1eLnYW-Pfb623pkUQUh6Vze2SBH0HTQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: zheap: a new storage format for PostgreSQL (Satyanarayana Narlapuram <Satyanarayana.Narlapuram@microsoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:00 PM, Satyanarayana Narlapuram <Satyanarayana.Narlapuram@microsoft.com> wrote: > >>> Cons > >>> ----------- >>> 1. Deletes can be somewhat expensive. >>> 2. Transaction aborts will be expensive. >>> 3. Updates that update most of the indexed columns can be somewhat >>> expensive. > > Given transaction aborts are expensive, is there any impact on the crash > recovery? I don't think there should be any direct impact of aborts on recovery time as we start processing the undo records after recovery is done. Basically, we invoke undo worker after recovery which performs the aborts in the background. >Did you perform any tests on the recovery duration? > Not yet, but I think we will do it after making some more progress. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: