Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+pV-xGZtHjS-3E3_-kXYr17xkuUaJWEn7CuXsK3L6xhA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 7:11 PM Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 1:24 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 4:46 PM Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> wrote: > > > > ------ > > Tables with a replica identity defined as <literal>NOTHING</literal>, > > <literal>DEFAULT</literal> without a primary key, or <literal>USING > > INDEX</literal> with a dropped index cannot support > > <command>UPDATE</command> or <command>DELETE</command> operations when > > included in a publication replicating these actions. Attempting such > > operations will result in an error on the publisher. > > ------ LGTM. I'll push this tomorrow unless there are more comments. I am planning to push this to HEAD as this is an improvement in existing docs and not any bug fix. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: