Re: Why is subscription/t/031_column_list.pl failing so much?
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why is subscription/t/031_column_list.pl failing so much? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+oz4GHePO0OFkTP6u1t1xRP0LpPW7MULxH2ufk8r0TdA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why is subscription/t/031_column_list.pl failing so much? (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why is subscription/t/031_column_list.pl failing so much?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 2:19 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:46 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 08:42, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > To resolve the BF > > > failure, I still feel, we should just recreate the subscription. This > > > is a pre-existing problem and we can track it via a separate patch > > > with a test case targetting such failures. > > > > +1 for going with recreation of the subscription, the changes for this > > are available at [1]. > > [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1hLZW4H4Z61swK6WPW6pcNcjzXqw%3D6NqG7e-RMtkFaZA%40mail.gmail.com > > > > Tom, and others, does anyone still object to going ahead with an idea > by just changing the test to recreate the subscription to silence BF > failures for this test? > Seeing no objections, I have pushed the required test changes to silence the BF. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: