Re: range test for hash index?
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: range test for hash index? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+f1YPZLg2zXGnhDQyjbtyoX_Q5vF=hWP3Ai253=G8cLw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | range test for hash index? (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: range test for hash index?
Re: range test for hash index? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 12:48 AM Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I noticed the tests for range types do this: > > create table numrange_test2(nr numrange); > create index numrange_test2_hash_idx on numrange_test2 (nr); > > Does that need a `using hash`? It seems like that's the intention. > I also think so. It appears to be added by commit 4429f6a9e3 which has also added support for hash_range. So ideally this index should be there to cover hash_range. I think you can once cross-check if by default this test-file covers the case of hash_range? If not and the change you are proposing starts covering that code, then there is a good chance that your finding is correct. In general, the hash_range is covered by some of the existing test, but I don't which test. See the code coverage report here: https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/utils/adt/rangetypes.c.gcov.html -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: