Re: pg_basebackup wish list
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup wish list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+c-Gyz5EEd_Bu5JZRdzJ1hXfWnWfmktxCX3RGk7n63Gw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup wish list (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_basebackup wish list
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think there is some value in providing >> .tar for -Z 0, > > I was thinking that "-Ft -Z0" is something like an alias of "-Ft". > That is, the backup is taken in uncompressed tar format. > >> however in that case how should we define usage of -F p >> -Z 0? Shall we say with plain format -Z 0 gets ignored or throw error >> or do something else? If first, then I think it is better to mention >> the same in docs. > > ISTM that it's better to ignore that case, like pg_dump -Ft -Z0 > doesn't throw an error. > Okay, then you can go ahead with your patch. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: