Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:27 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:34 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > We saw OOM in a system where WAL sender consumed Gigabttes of memory
> > which was never released. Upon investigation, we found out that there
> > were many ReorderBufferToastHash memory contexts linked to
> > ReorderBuffer context, together consuming gigs of memory. They were
> > running INSERT ... ON CONFLICT .. among other things. A similar report
> > at [1]
>
> What is the relationship between this bug and commit 7259736a6e5,
> dealt specifically with TOAST and speculative insertion resource
> management issues within reorderbuffer.c? Amit?
>

This seems to be a pre-existing bug. This should be reproduced in
PG-13 and or prior to that commit. Ashutosh can confirm?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.