Re: PG Docs for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH PUBLICATION - copy_data option
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG Docs for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH PUBLICATION - copy_data option |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+S3-MMLuNkxE0tPJQrofWm6ifFDSh=GgGyWwyd4-u0Qw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG Docs for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH PUBLICATION - copy_data option (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 8:49 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 8:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:20 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > But I recently learned that when there are partitions in the > > > publication, then toggling the value of the PUBLICATION option > > > "publish_via_partition_root" [3] can also *implicitly* change the list > > > published tables, and therefore that too might cause any ASRP to make > > > use of the copy_data value for those implicitly added > > > partitions/tables. > > > > > > > I have tried the below example in this context but didn't see any > > effect on changing via_root option. > > Thanks for trying to reproduce. I also thought your steps were the > same as what I'd previously done but it seems like it was a bit > different. Below are my steps to observe some unexpected COPY > happening. Actually, now I am no longer sure if this is just a > documentation issue; perhaps it is a bug. > Yeah, this looks odd to me as well. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: