Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+RdASBimnEtn8ML7DD1xRsnZ_8k5ZPygHazk07D_kemg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm. (Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > ================== > One problem now I have kept it open is multiple "auto pg_prewarm dump" > can be launched even if already a dump/load worker is running by > calling launch_pg_prewarm_dump. I can avoid this by dropping a > lock-file before starting the bgworkers. But, if there is an another > method to avoid launching bgworker on a simple method I can do same. > How about keeping a variable in PROC_HDR structure to indicate if already one dump worker is running, then don't allow to start a new one? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: