Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+QwmQUJZqiqydTDkpy2CxG9At0Uduj7fuA4KLKQLbZtw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:50 PM Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote: > > Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The earlier version of the patch having all these ideas > > implemented is attached > > (Infrastructure-to-execute-pending-undo-actions and > > Provide-interfaces-to-store-and-fetch-undo-records). The second one > > has some APIs used by the first one but the main concepts were > > implemented in the first one > > (Infrastructure-to-execute-pending-undo-actions). I see that in the > > current version these can't be used as it is but still it can give us > > a good start point and we might be able to either re-use some code and > > or ideas from these patches. > > Is there a branch with these patches applied? They reference some functions > that I don't see in [1]. I'd like to examine if / how my approach can be > aligned with the current zheap design. > Can you once check in the patch-set attached in the email [1]? [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKG%2BMpzRsZFE7ChhRq-Br5VYYi6mafVQ73Af7ahioWo5o8w%40mail.gmail.com -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: