Re: dropdb --force
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dropdb --force |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+NLNvbU0WT+20GX7Aj9V7c2zCZGKj63-p1BGrZ=LUROQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: dropdb --force (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: dropdb --force
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 8:45 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 4:57 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I check it now - it has sense. the described switch can protect users against useless client killing. > > > > I have committed that patch. Please find the rebased patch attached. > Additionally, I ran the pgindent. I will wait for two days and see if > you or anyone else has more inputs on the patch, if not, then I will > take one more pass and commit it on Wednesday morning. > This patch adds a few test cases to test the syntax in /src/test/regress/sql/drop_if_exists.sql which I think is not the best place to add the tests for this feature as it is primarily testing .. IF EXISTS .. syntax. OTOH, I am not sure if there is any other better place to add those. The other option could be to add a new test file, but again I am not sure if it is worth to do so for a few tests. We can even decide not to have tests for this feature as the tests are just testing the syntax which I think can help if we want to extend the syntax in the future. Any opinions? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: