Re: zheap: a new storage format for PostgreSQL
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: zheap: a new storage format for PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1+Lop8aXu7zNXWTQKxhZBnnAabLS9S1S+LY_XNAp5oJ6A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: zheap: a new storage format for PostgreSQL (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: zheap: a new storage format for PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:03 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > čt 6. 12. 2018 v 5:02 odesílatel Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com> napsal: >> >> COPY command seems to have improved very slightly with zheap in both with size of wal and execution time. I also did sometests with insert statement where I could see some regression in zheap when compared to heap with respect to executiontime. With further more investigation I will reply here. >> > > 20% of size reduction looks like effect of fill factor. > I think it is because of smaller zheap tuple sizes. Mithun can tell more about setup whether he has used different fillfactor or anything else which could lead to such a big difference. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: