Re: Use consistent terminology for tablesync slots.

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 2:21 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The logical replication tablesync worker creates tablesync slots.
>
> Previously some PG docs pages were referring to these as "tablesync
> slots", but other pages called them as "table synchronization slots".
>
> PSA a trivial patch which (for consistency) now calls them all the
> same -  "tablesync slots"
>

+1 for the consistency. But I think it better to use "table
synchronization slots" in the user-facing docs as that makes it easier
for users to understand.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.